Talk:Belgranodeutsch

Proposed deletion
Most of the article is misleading or presents false claims. Of the sources cited only one made reference to Belgranodeutsch, but it doesn't offer any first hand sources and it lacks academic rigour. As for the rest of the article there is no evidence given to support any of the statements made of the last two paragraphs. Furthermore the claim that "Belgranodeutsch still survives" is simply not true. If we clean up the article all that would be left would be a one line sentence. A merge has been proposed after the deletion proposal was posted but I believe this article to be of such poor quality and the information presented to be at best redundant and at worst simply not true that merging is not an acceptable or desirable. solution.I invite any Admin to weigh on this and decide. --March Fox (talk) 21:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Feel free to prune further in situ. I've removed the examples section as it was unreferenced other than by a blacklisted site. Klbrain (talk) 20:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Meaning of the C and R in Belgrano C and Belgrano R
I never heard of the term "Belgranodeutsch" before reading this interesting article, but my experience in Belgrano was mostly a half century ago. From that experience I learned that the "C" in "Belgrano C" signified "Central", and the "R" in "Belgrano R" meant "Rosario". (See the Historia section of the Spanish-language article on Belgrano R .) If the "commercial" and "residential" meanings have become current in the intervening years, perhaps that could be sourced; or perhaps the terms "commercial" and "residential" could be dropped altogether. People interested in the characteristics of the neighborhoods surrounding the stations could always refer to the article Belgrano, Buenos Aires. Jim (talk) 05:42, 21 January 2020 (UTC)