Talk:Bellanca Viking

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Bellanca 17-30 → Bellanca Viking – While the 17-30 designation is technically correct, and seems to meet the civil-aircraft naming standard from what I can see, "Viking" is the WP:COMMONNAME of the aircraft - I had never heard of a "Bellanca 17-30" until just now, but I was very familiar with the "Bellanca Viking" and Super Viking. The Bushranger One ping only 09:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * "Viking" doesnt actually appear on the type certificate which is why the proper/official Bellanca 17-30 name was originally used. That said I dont have a problem with the marketing name being used per common name. MilborneOne (talk) 20:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bellanca Viking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090224234332/http://home.att.net:80/~vikingdrvr/faq.html to http://home.att.net/~vikingdrvr/faq.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)