Talk:Bellingham Square station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Eviolite (talk · contribs) 02:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

I'll review this article within the week. ev iolite  (talk)  02:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

putting on hold. ev iolite  (talk)  16:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Sourcing, images good
 * For the lead, add a qualifier like "the newly constructed" before Chelsea station in the last sentence, for clarity
 * Unless I'm missing something, "Washington Street" should be "Washington Avenue" in all mentions (including in history)
 * "The remaining commuter rail platform is located on the north side of the two tracks, with a metal shelter. The station is accessible for Silver Line buses but not commuter rail." - since commuter rail no longer stops at the station I would clarify with something like "disused" (and I don't know if accessibility for the rail platforms are necessary for the same reason)
 * ✅ Updated the wording.
 * I'm a bit confused, can't see where on the map it suggests that Route 111 runs on Broadway (it looks to be a different road from 116/117)
 * Link Revere, Massachusetts and main line (railway)
 * Per Using maps and similar sources in Wikipedia articles, "in the 1880s or 1890s." should probably be "by the 1890s".
 * Not sure why there's an ellipsis after "Danvers River drawbridge"
 * ✅ It was my addition, but I have no idea why. Perhaps a stray kitty paw.
 * There's a mention of "right of way" before the link - should move the link up (and change it to use "right-of-way" for consistency)
 * Per Using maps and similar sources in Wikipedia articles, "in the 1880s or 1890s." should probably be "by the 1890s".
 * Not sure why there's an ellipsis after "Danvers River drawbridge"
 * ✅ It was my addition, but I have no idea why. Perhaps a stray kitty paw.
 * There's a mention of "right of way" before the link - should move the link up (and change it to use "right-of-way" for consistency)
 * There's a mention of "right of way" before the link - should move the link up (and change it to use "right-of-way" for consistency)
 * Thanks for the review! I've implemented all your recommendations. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Happy to promote now, another fine piece of work. ev iolite   (talk)  02:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)