Talk:Ben Sherman

Advertising
One look at this article should convince anyone that it needs to be removed or completely rewritten. Ben Sherman Group Limited is obviously using Wikipedia as a medium for advertising. -unsigned


 * That advertising-style version of the article was written by User:BenShermanHQ. I have reverted the article to the proper version.Spylab (talk) 14:30, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

In popular culture
How dare you delete the reference from Only Fools and Horses? It's just as relevant and a historical fact as anything else.
 * If it is relevant its significance will have been discussed in a independent source - if you can find such critical commentary in a reliable source then it can be included. The reason it has been removed is that it is unsourced trivia which includes POV statements and does not meet the guidelines for inclusion. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:32, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

That makes no sense. Anything from popular culture can be inluded if 'seen by the eyes' of the person who writes that part into the article. I have seen the first episode of Only Fools and Horses many times and there is a clear reference to a Ben Sherman shirt. How is that not factual enough? Am I supposed to illegaly upload a DVD and give a link so that people would believe it??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.194.194 (talk) 17:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Categories
I added this to which I think is accurate -- however the category structure here seems to have some redundancies. Also, with the various acquisitions, is it "still" a British brand? Arided (talk) 23:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Checks
Aren't Ben Sherman shirts usually brightly checkered? Maikel (talk) 04:21, 10 February 2020 (UTC)