Talk:Ben Swann/Archives/2019/March

Section 3. Controversial views and claims
The middle of the fourth paragraph of section 3. Controversial views and claims has run off the grammatical rails: The piece used language that was similar to Russian propaganda about Syria. In addition, Russian-backed production and distribution of polished videos that were spread on Facebook and websites in the United States. I'd boldly edit, but am not sure of the intent. — Neonorange (Phil) 05:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I just edited this... at first removing the word "that"... but then removing the second sentence entirely. It's not necessary and gets a little off point for this article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 10:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all the reconstruction. After the considerable back-and-forth, excess was bound to linger. — Neonorange (Phil) 17:55, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * In all fairness, that addition came from me... and was clearly a mistake.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2018 (UTC)