Talk:Bengaluru Underworld

Requested move 17 January 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Page moved. Contrary to the RM initiator, opposition did not demonstrate the common name. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 22:38, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Bangalore Underworld → Bengaluru Underworld – Official name as shown by CBFC certificate on trailer. The Times of India review uses the same name. DareshMohan (talk) 07:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

— Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him &#124; talk) 21:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose move. Request does not take WP:COMMONNAME into account.  O.N.R.  (talk) 05:52, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Support We're not dealing with with a ton of English language coverage, but among the coverage that exists the proposed name appears to be common. When the common name and the official name are the same, there's little reason it shouldn't be our page title.--Yaksar (let's chat) 16:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Support More sources seem to use the proposed spelling. City's common name does not necessarily corelate with the film's common name. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)