Talk:Benton fireworks disaster

Description
I don't know if "industrial disaster" is the best way to describe this incident. This was an illegal operation, not a licensed industry.Bmag32 (talk) 17:24, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, I get this feeling that there might be a better title for this article.Bmag32 (talk) 17:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Stuff to add
This is a pretty good article, reads well, and is probably about c or b-class. It needs to things, though- exact location and more info about the after math. Bmag32 (talk) 00:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Location- I know the approximate location but have not get been able to find exactly where it is located.
 * Aftermath/ What happened to the farm, the site today, the event in popular culture, etc.

Use of the word "successful" not appropriate
How can this operation be called successful? I removed the word successful from the opening paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.226.162.191 (talk) 08:19, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Summary: "Accused" and "Convicted"
The summary of this article (i.e. the table containing the basic facts) lists just one man accused and the same convicted, but the article shows that many people were charged and several of those were also convicted. Isn't the table misleading as it is? Shouldn't all the names appear? (Or at least name all those who were convicted, and perhaps just a number stating how many were charged but not convicted) TooManyFingers (talk) 04:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The number of people accused and convicted should probably be included, but not the names of everyone. Bneu2013 (talk) 13:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)