Talk:Berenice Quezada

stub class comment
Hi wikipedians, the class should remain as stub. This page needs more ref (Spanish ref OK but prefer English ref). Specific cit/ref is needed to confirm birth date and height as they were modified to different values. See change history as needed. SWP13 (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No, it is not a stub class article anymore. The above editor has made up her own assessments, and I have been trying to point her to the assessment table that explains the assessment classes. Stub is for an article that is a stub size and has a stub tag in it or for an article that is of very bad quality. This article is not one step away from deletion. Please see Content assessment where it says, "A very basic description of the topic. However, all very-bad-quality articles will fall into this category." dawnleelynn(talk) 00:12, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Incidentally I agree, and so did ORES, that this was a stub. It was only 80 words of prose—a “very basic description”—and had no inline citations, a significant quality issue for a WP:BLP. I’ve tried to improve on both. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)