Talk:Berman and Company

Sorry flowanda
Sorry flowanda. Misread some of the changes you had made to the article. It's a known PR firm with a high awareness of its internet image, so I scrutinized them overmuch. Addisonstrack 21:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Bwah-ha-ha-ha-ha! Gee, I suck at evil laughs...but no problem...and I don't mind scrutiny at all. :) Flowanda | Talk 23:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning: Lobbyists Berman and Company at work
This article has been edited anonymously by Berman and Company, who are lobbyists for amongst others the American Beverage Institute, the Center for Consumer Freedom, the Center for Union Facts and the Employment Policies Institute.

IP address of 66.208.14.242 traces to Berman and Company, see the Whois report. I Spy With My Big Eye (talk) 11:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Good that there are people on the lookout for this kind of thing :D! I'll be going at that users edit with appropriate vigor. But first I'm removing some of the uncited claims. I searched for "employs razor-sharp wit and unconventional tactics to annoy, unsettle and, some say, intimidate its opponents" but could only find it here http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0803/nanny_science.asp (hardly the chicago tribune). So removed. Sean Heron (talk) 20:17, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete income section
How is a bill to a single client in 2012 relevant to the overall income? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdabs (talk • contribs) 17:38, 24 July 2019 (UTC)