Talk:Bernard "BB" Bragg

Merging
Seems like an obvious merge. Anyone have any thoughts on this? It seems pointless to go through editing all of this when it could be merged. Cleanelephant (talk) 21:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

is this serious? doesnt look like — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.27.129.16 (talk) 00:32, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge Appears to be the same person, so a merge is not only advised, but required. I'm not sure of the justification for creating both pages within two days of each other (I suppose it's possible that two different editors may have created the articles independently without knowledge of the other), but the pages should be merged.  From a glance, there appears to be quite a bit of info here that isn't in the Bernard Bragg article (I haven't gone through all the sources to verify all of it), so although it's an obvious candidate for a merge (either redirecting this page to Bernard Bragg or that page here), the two articles should be carefully read and edited to include all relevant/reliably-sourced information from both articles.  Granted, this looks like quite a bit of work, but, as far as I'm concerned, there doesn't appear to be any need for reaching a consensus regarding whether to merge.  Anyone who has the time/inclination should feel free to "be bold" and begin work on merging the information on both articles into one. --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 01:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

GOCEreviewed
Shouldn't copy-edit while there's a merge propsal outstanding. There are two articles on the same person. --Stfg (talk) 11:41, 30 October 2012 (UTC)