Talk:Bernicia/Archive 1

Work
This still needs some work, particularly the Saxon part, but I have revamped the existing information so that it is presented in a better order and is not misleading in any way: a) The previous 'Bryneich' information needed clarifying. I have removed the kinglist because it is pure supposition that that line relates to Bryneich. b) I have removed a paragraph relating to post-634 expansion to the Northumbria page. The 'Forcibly United Northumbria' section should probably also be transferred to Northumbria. Does anyone have any strong opinions on this? c) I have removed all Saxon name forms, such as Æðelfriþ, as these are meaningless to anyone unfamiliar with the subject. Walgamanus 21:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Brythonic spellings
End all the racist claims against Brythons, Wales and the Welsh/Cumbric language! --86.29.249.216 13:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

While I think the modern Welsh spellings are useful, I think they are misleading for two reasons - firstly, the language spoken there, at that time was not quite "Welsh", in the sense of coming from the area now known as "Wales", and secondly, would have been very different to what is spoken in Wales today anyway, purely because of evolution. --MacRusgail 16:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Rubbish - if that so, why are modern English spellings used in this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.201.209.9 (talk) 21:17, August 27, 2007 (UTC)


 * I was thinking something similar. The parts with 'known in Welsh as..', is it Welsh? or the language of what is now England? Gazh 14:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

National nomicultural spellings.
See the E.B.K. web-site's spellings!

  --86.29.249.107 01:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Brythons/Britons being refered to as 'Welsh'
It appears once in this article and is a bit POV for my liking, removed it now, hope it doesn't offend. Gazh 10:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

The Welsh and Cornish are not Brythons, there English!

Bploks!--86.25.49.68 14:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)