Talk:Bernstein's Bagels/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 02:08, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 11:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello again! I'll take a look and review this GA nomination! --Vacant0 (talk) 11:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Initial comments

 * There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 18% in similarity.
 * There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
 * The article is stable. You've created the article 2 days ago and so far you're the only contributor.
 * No previous GA reviews.

General comments

 * Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
 * No problems were found in the lede.
 * The rest of the article is okay. I could not find any grammatical issues or weird sentences.
 * Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
 * Alt texts are present in the article. Good job.
 * The article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, and MOS:WTW guidelines. There is no fiction and embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:WAF and MOS:EMBED.
 * I do have a recommendation for the lede, though. What about a short sentence on what they offer (from the Description section) in the shop?
 * Added "Bernstein's serves bagels with schmears and sides like eggs, lox, and prosciutto, as well as bagel sandwiches, coffee, and tea." --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
 * References section with a reflist template is present in the article.
 * No referencing issues.
 * Listed references are reliable, all are news websites. References have been archived.
 * Address is not referenced in the infobox. I've noticed a few references mention this address, such as Ref 5, so add it either to the infobox or as a new sentence in the text.
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Spotchecked Ref 1, 2, 3, 5 7, 9, 10, 18, 20–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
 * Copyvio already checked.
 * Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
 * The St. Johns location closed – Do we know when?
 * Not yet! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The article stays focused on the topic.
 * Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
 * The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
 * Checking whether the article is stable.
 * As noted in the initial comments, there has not been any edit warring since the creation of the article.
 * Checking images.
 * All looks good, the logo has been uploaded under a non-free licence while the image is under GFDL.

Final comments
There are a couple of things to fix, but other than that, the article is in a good shape. I will put the nomination on hold for a week. Once the issues get addressed, I'll promote the article. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 12:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much! I think I have addressed your concerns, but please let me know if any remain. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Looks good now. Promoting. Vacant0 (talk) 13:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)