Talk:Bertha Pappenheim

--Remotelysensed (talk) 18:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

An excellent article
For what it's worth, my thanks to the editors. — Ineuw talk 03:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Merge
I don't understand why we have to article for the same personne. --Nouill (talk) 13:54, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * There's a case to be made for either one or two articles but for this subject, and unlike the others, Bertha Pappenheim would meet WP:BLP in her own right. I thus support two articles. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:40, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * She is a prominent figure in her own right. It seems unavoidable to have Anna O. as a separate article because there is so much attention to this case in the psych and related literature. As it stands now, Anna O is mentioned her with a link to the main article. That's appropriate. I think this old merge tag and discussion can be closed. Closed with result: No merge. ProfGray (talk) 16:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Merge
You are all aware of Anna O., right?24.212.226.202 (talk) 05:58, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Bertha Pappenheim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081207034021/http://www.utoronto.ca:80/wjudaism/encyclopedia/e_p.html to http://www.utoronto.ca/wjudaism/encyclopedia/e_p.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 11:09, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Merge proposal: a perennially ignored request
I propose that Anna O. is merged into Bertha Pappenheim. Both articles are about the same person (overlap). Further, neither article can be a complete discussion of their topic without going into details of the other (context) - although a valiant attempt at scrubbing all mention of her psychological condition has been made here, it does just mean the article reads as incomplete. It's also inaccurate and misleading to portray it as two distinct parts, mental illness isn't something that is separate from the rest of a person's life. And it isn't exactly separate from her notability as Pappenheim, given that some of the coverage of what's in this article occurred because people started to pay more attention to every part of "Anna O." I proposed that Bertha Pappenheim is the final article because she is well known as having been Anna O. and is notable separately under her real name, while Anna O. is only used to refer to her during her illness. Bertha Pappenheim refers to all of her life; Anna O. refers to her period of treatment (and the case study). I'm going to go do the tagging now. Please ping me if you want me to see the response. --Xurizuri (talk) 05:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It's been a fortnight, so I'll be WP:BOLD due to the WP:SILENCE. Obviously, if anyone disagrees, feel free to revert - I'll try to keep the number of edits to 1 per page so that it's easier to do. There would be an edit to each article and to each talk page. --Xurizuri (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Xurizuri (talk) 03:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Elizabeth Thornton?
She was a writer, not a medical researcher. The link looks irrelevant. נוף כרמל (talk) 19:37, 15 November 2023 (UTC)