Talk:Beryl May Dent/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 04:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Picking up this one. Review to follow. Hawkeye7  (discuss)  04:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments


 * Link University of Bristol, Metropolitan-Vickers Electrical Company, Newnham College, Cambridge, First Class Honours
 * Good spot . I have linked those terms in the lede section. Gricharduk (talk) 06:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


 * "was the first to develop a reduced major axis" What with the bolding?
 * I have removed the bolding. Gricharduk (talk) 06:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

The above is not enough to hold up passing the article. Strongly recommend sending it to FAC.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: