Talk:Best-effort delivery

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Durgalavanya.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Internet
The article claims that integrated services and differentiated services are available on the internet. To my knowledge neither is available. differentiated services is available on some newer private networks. --Kvng (talk) 19:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * This is to my knowledge one of the most crucial points in the discussion on Net Neutrality. AFAIK the internet is not neutral anymore, because many triple play services enjoy QoS. I don´t have a valid source for this though. --213.61.29.18 (talk) 11:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I tried to rewrite the text, and removed the Internet template. I don't get the neutraliticy issue, you don't pay the same amount of money to the triple-play service providers. (The triple play QoS are typically based on Ethernet VLAN rather than IP QoS mechanisms.)Mange01 (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

This was all getting off topic so I delete the last two paragraphs. We don't need to know what isn't best effort or where it is not used. My understanding is that: --Kvng (talk) 14:35, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Classic Internet is pure best effort
 * 2) There are services (e.g. Akamai Technologies, Limelight Networks) allow one to bypass the classic Internet but you're still on a best effort basis there competing with other users of those services.
 * 3) ISPs may differentiate services at the edges of the Internet
 * 4) Networks without QoS capability or without QoS configured are best effort
 * 5) IntServ is only currently used on experimental or niche basis
 * 6) DiffServ is not deployed on anything larger than a campus network

Style
This sounds like an essay and does not sound very encyclopediaish Aceofspades, Refining Wikipedia one edit at a time (talk) 21:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I disagree and have removed the template accordingly -- if you want to add the template again, please provide a more detailed reason (e.g. point out problems with organization/wording/overall structure/etc. that you think should be fixed). 138.16.160.4 (talk) 14:52, 10 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree, essay does not seem to apply at this point. The article could use a bit of expansion though. --Kvng (talk) 13:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

structure
This article is not properly structured and it is not fulfilling the wikipedia rules and regulations. There is no proper overview of the article and there is no history and there is no contents section in this article to get the overview of the article, and no proper conclusion of the article and there is no relevant citations and references for this article and the article need to be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.84.227.12 (talk) 03:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Use in service delivery (non-IT use)
The term best-effort delivery is also used in a similar scenario in service delivery management, perhaps this could be added in a paragraph or included elsewhere? What are your thoughts? Jurryaany (talk) 18:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Is this use of the term mentioned elsewhere on Wikipedia? I'm warmer about adding it if we can link to something. ~Kvng (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

I think it is also a legal term. 84.250.167.86 (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)