Talk:Betavexity

This page should be deleted
Some notes:
 * The term "betavexity" has only around 300 results on Google
 * The term "betavexity" doesn't appear to be in any books.
 * The term "betavexity" doesn't appear on Google Scholar
 * I found the two references given in the current article. The term "betavexity" didn't appear in either.

From the above and per Deletion policy, reasons to delete include
 * Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and hoaxes
 * Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed
 * Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline. Per Notability, this page should have "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". This is not the case so far as I can tell.

Finally, the article is very short and doesn't even tell the reader what the term means - it just says the term is similar to other terms. Earlier versions of the article mentioned that the theory is that securities can exhibit one beta with positive moves and a different beta with negative moves, but this was cut back in 2009. If we choose to keep the article, we should at least bring back additional context from the earlier versions.

Irony0 (talk) 18:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I suggest the creation of an WP:AFD-discussion. --TheImaCow (talk) 18:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I feel also that we should delete - no other sources seem to discuss this concept. Fintor (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)