Talk:Betsimisaraka people/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 04:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

I will review this article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 2, 2015, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: One can tell that this article was written primarily by someone with an expert-level knowledge of the subject matter, and a strong command of the English language. And yet, the writing style is accessible to the reader and the average layman, at the same time.
 * 2. Verifiable?: Duly cited throughout, to excellent sources, with good overall citation style format.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Covers major aspects of History, Society, and Culture, perhaps better than most other encyclopedic works on the same subject matter.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Presented in an neutrally worded tone with matter of fact presentation style.
 * 5. Stable? Upon my inspection of article edit history and article talk page history, no issues going back several months.
 * 6. Images?: Four (4) images, all hosted on Wikimedia Commons, all check out upon inspection of image pages. One minor suggestion -- suggest adding image location data to those image pages with geographic coordinates.

Simply excellent quality improvement effort. Most impressive. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:01, 2 October 2015 (UTC)