Talk:Better Government Association/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grammarxxx (talk · contribs) 21:12, 13 April 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Doesn't adhere to MoS, including references.
 * A. References to sources:
 * No in-line citations: accessdate, author, work, ect...
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Majority of works cited is to the subjects webpage, not a RS.
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Definitely not, this organizations been around for nearly 100 years and this is all there is?
 * B. Focused:
 * Too many minor details.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Impossible without RS.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

I am quickfailing this article due to a lack of comprehensiveness and poor references that cannot be fixed within 7 days. This article was created yesterday by a new user, I suggest the user read over the good article criteria before nominating any other articles. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 21:17, 13 April 2013 (UTC)