Talk:Beverly Schmidt Blossom

I disagree with the deletion of NY Times review material. Whether it is necessary is part of the understanding of the ephemeral nature of dance. These reviews are the only evidence of this choreographer's work. 67.162.126.108 (talk) 21:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

By the definition of stub class quality, this article should not have received this grade. It is evident that bots cannot and should not be used to grade articles.Donalds (talk) 03:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * http://www.warholstars.org/chron/judsondance9-12.html
 * http://elitedance.com/blog/?p=605
 * http://www.marthahilldance.org
 * http://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/01/arts/critic-s-notebook-when-a-dancer-s-shape-surprises-the-audience.html67.162.126.108 (talk) 21:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Beverly Schmidt Blossom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710181737/http://elitedance.com/blog/2009/09/15/the-martha-hill-dance-fund-announces-the-2009-award-recipients/ to http://elitedance.com/blog/2009/09/15/the-martha-hill-dance-fund-announces-the-2009-award-recipients
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924040408/http://www.beverlyblossom.com:80/writeup.html to http://www.beverlyblossom.com/writeup.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:41, 1 November 2016 (UTC)