Talk:Beyond Daylight

Fair use rationale for Image:Vanden Plas Beyond Daylight.jpg
Image:Vanden Plas Beyond Daylight.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Notability
This page carries a 'notability warning' - however, it's one album amongst others by the band, and the other albums don't carry the same warning. Although I haven't looked for sources to cite its notability, surely if the band is notable enough to have their own Wiki page, and their OTHER albums are notable enough for the same reasons, there's no reason for this one to be 'not notable'? Musicfan1353 (talk) 09:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Just because the other albums don't have warnings doesn't mean that they're notable. See WP:OTHERSTUFF for some background; the presence of an article on Wikipedia shouldn't, on its own, be considered evidence that the topic is notable. It may just mean that the topic's notability hasn't been assessed or challenged. If you want to establish that the album is notable, please add references from reliable sources which discuss the album in depth. Pburka (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * So how would the 'not notable' ones have got past the review process in the first place? I've tried to add updates to other band pages and had them rejected for being not notable ... 86.171.132.192 (talk) 10:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * There is no review process. It just depends on some editor noticing and doing something about it. Please review WP:BAND and WP:ALBUM to see what makes a band or album notable. The criteria for musicians are very, very lenient, but a local band that's never charted probably isn't going to qualify, no matter how popular they are in their own niche. Pburka (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2016 (UTC)