Talk:Bhagat Singh/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * 1) This article is no where ready for a GA review it fails on references
 * 2) ref 1 is a primary source
 * 3) ref 3 is that is a book used which is not clear it needs to be formated using WP:CITESHORT
 * 4) ref 4 what makes http://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/rdv3n1/bsingh.htm a reliable site also needs access dates
 * 5) ref 5 same as ref 3 above and needs a page number
 * 6) ref 7 same as ref 3 needs a publishing location
 * 7) ref 8 needs the cite web template used with details filled in and what makes http://www.sbsec.org/s.bhagatsingh.html a reliable site
 * 8) ref 9 see ref 3 above
 * 9) ref 10 as above and publishing location needed
 * 10) refs 11 12 and 16 Sanyal (2006) presume is a book needs adding to a bibliography
 * 11) ref 13 and 14 see WP:CITESHORT
 * 12) ref 15 needs the cite web template filing in and what makes http://www.shahidbhagatsingh.org/index.asp?link=problem_of_pb a reliable site
 * 13) ref 17 same as above but web site is http://www.allaboutsikhs.com/sikh-martyrs/sikh-martyrs-shaheed-bhagat-singh.html
 * 14) ref 18 we do not use wikipedia as a reference
 * 15) Thats just an example of whats wrong the rest of the references are more or less the same as I do not believe this can be rectified in time I am going to quick fail to allow you to work on these before submitting again.--Jim Sweeney (talk) 21:20, 29 September 2010 (UTC)