Talk:Bhakti Sharma

Parallel DYKReview for Instructional purposes
Since you have added me for DYK credit, I cant review it. But let us do a parallel DYK Review so that you can learn from it. AshLin (talk) 14:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

When someone presses the Comment/review button or the edit link of the page, details of the criteria to review appear autmatically on the page above the text box automatically..

{{scroll box|

Article

 * 1) New – within the past seven days, the article has
 * been created (sandbox ? mainspace is eligible); or
 * had its prose portion expanded at least fivefold; or
 * had its prose portion expanded at least twofold (only applies to BLPs that were completely unreferenced before expansion)
 * been promoted to good article status


 * 1) Long enough – the prose portion is at least 1,500 characters
 * 2) Within policy – meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular:
 * is neutral
 * cites sources with inline citations
 * is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism

Hook

 * 1) Format – fewer than 200 characters (shorter is better) and meets the formatting guidelines
 * 2) Content
 * interesting
 * hook fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article
 * neutral and does not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people

Other

 * 1) QPQ – all nominators who have five or more DYK credits must review another article.
 * 2) Image must
 * be free (no fair use)
 * be used in the article
 * show up well at small size (100 × 100px)



You may notify the nominator of problems with Bhakti Sharma

}}

Parallel DYK Review
(for instructional purposes only)
 * New. Article created on 15 Jan 2015. Nominated 19 Jan 2015. Hence new enough. (Needs to be nominated within 7 days of creaion/expansion).
 * Long enough. Present prose size (using DYK check script) - 1588 characters, 274 words (for this version). Just within the mandatory 1500 characters. Hence sufficient from DYK Point of view but would be great if it can be expanded even more.

...to be continued. AshLin (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2015 (UTC)