Talk:Bhat family

}}

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Bhat family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150514170559/https://www.manase.org/en/maharashtra.php?mid=68&smid=21&did=0&dsid=0&pmid=0&id=463 to https://www.manase.org/en/maharashtra.php?mid=68&smid=21&did=0&dsid=0&pmid=0&id=463

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Name change
Bhat is a very common surname among Brahmins. Since this article is about a specific Bhat family who were de facto rulers over a huge territory in 18th century India, I propose the name should be changed to reflect their place in history. The title could be: 1.Bhat family Peshwas or 2.Peshwas of Maratha empire from the Bhat family or 3.Peshwa Balaji Vishwanath and his descendents Please suggest other titles if appropriate. Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The entire thing should be merged into Peshwa, minus the copyright violations and unsourced material. - Sitush (talk) 14:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Sitush,many Bhat family members played important parts in 18th century Maratha history,however, not all of them held the Peshwa position.That's the reason this article should not be merged.Jonathansammy (talk) 16:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Current members
Some other Indian ruler pages use this as a source of information about the ruler and his succession. The same source website also lists the Nawabs of Banda here. So I wanted to know whether it would be okay if I add the one current hereditary descendants of the Peshwas to the article through the line of Mastani and Bajirao I. >>> Extorc . talk ; 19:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @Jonathansammy, your comments? >>> Extorc . talk ; 20:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @ >>> Extorc . talk ;, As long as you have reliable sources, I don't think there should be any problem. Although not by name, Bajirao and Mastani's descendants are mentioned under "Present generation". I wouldn't recommend adding a whole tree for descendants of Ali Bahadur II.In my opinion, no descendants of Indian Royal houses after 1947 should b e included in any trees on Wikipedia.If you do see any then let me know.Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 21:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @Jonathansammy The Mewar has its pretenders in its page. >>> Extorc . talk ; 06:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * >>> Extorc . talk ; Yes, the titular heads of The Mewar are listed, however, they all have their own pages. This makes them notable, and therefore it is not as easy to remove.Regards.Jonathansammy (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Firstly would you like to comment on the source i have provided. @Jonathansammy >>> Extorc . talk ; 17:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * >>> Extorc . talk ; No, that doesn't look like a reliable source. I know you will ask me about other articles. However,in order to be useful to Wikipedia, I limit myself mainly to Maharashtra related articles.I recommend you to clean up other articles where sources are not provided. Finally, although Banda is not in Maharashtra, I consider Shamsher Bahadur's present day descendants to be the only true male line heirs of the great Bajirao I Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 17:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

.