Talk:Bhoja

WP:INDIA Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
WP India with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate, please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 10:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Bhojas were classed as Ahirs.
Bhojas were classed with the Ahirs and belonged to Yadu group.

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=i8b8KObEUWUC&q=Jadon+ahirs&dq=Jadon+ahirs&hl=en&ei=uet9TZDgJpDMrQemofDHBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBDgo

The metaphysical magazine, Volume 16-page-333

http://books.google.co.in/books?id=wT-BAAAAMAAJ&q=abhiras+inhabitants+of+rajputana&dq=abhiras+inhabitants+of+rajputana&hl=en&ei=ui2HTZLDDIe8rAefr6U1&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC0Q6AEwAA

Ponwar
King Bhoja is descendant of paramara dynasty of Ponwar Clan which was also called as Pramar dynasty. All sanskrit scriptures specify Pramar   for King Bhoja's clan. All Imperial gazetteer and document written during year 1300 to 1700 specify that Bhoja was of the Powar or Ponwar  Tribe. King Bhoja was also have the title as Parmeshwara. Parmar can be termed as Kul ( title ) name of King Bhoja. Though he was Ponwar. HistoricalQuest (talk) 07:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * British-era Imperial gazetteers are not acceptable sources in this context -- this has been discussed several times at WP:RSN. Which doucments from "1300" call Bhoja a "Ponwar"? utcursch &#124; talk 13:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

As I know Panwar or Punwar  is specified as name of Bhoja's dynasty  in Ain a Akbari written by Abu fazal. Bhoja was 21st king of Panwar dynasty. Please refer - https://books.google.co.in/books?id=-PjiAAAAMAAJ&dq=++bhoja+++21st+king

Raja Bhoja is belongs to gurjar clans
Bhoja is belongs to gurjar clans 42.111.36.168 (talk) 07:13, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * And your WP:Reliable sources for that claim are? - Arjayay (talk) 11:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes you are correct there is no proof of Rajput’s existence before the 16th century Harshitbhati2006jik (talk) 02:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)