Talk:Bhuleshwar Temple

citations are needed for approved information
I've noticed that someone has added information without any citation! That should be Removed straight away in till the information has citations backing it claims.

'''Temple was built during the period of 1230 AD during Yadava Rulers. It is believed that the temple was ruined by Muslim invaders and reconstructed later because the entrance of the temple is hidden like Gaimukhi Buruj construction of Shivaji's time.[citation needed] The fort on which the temple is situated is called as Daulatmangal fort, also at times referred as Mangalgad. Black basalt (AA type) rock was brought to construct this temple which is different as compared to surrounding brownish color basalt which has high percentage of calcium (lime - Chuna).[citation needed] The fort was constructed in 1629 by Murar Jagdev who, in 1630, looted Pune. He then built the fort to keep a watch on the city.[2]'''

The High lighted wording above i would like to remove as this has no citations and Wikipedia is extreme sensitive when dealing with solid established verification.82.38.161.217 (talk) 14:29, 29 December 2013 (UTC)veda

THREAT FOR POINTING OUT POOR CITATIONS? Screen recording in process
Asking editor on this TALK PAGE to give Good solid reference to his information on The Bhuleshwar Temple rebuild, I have checked online to see what citations have been given & it happens to have the worst ratings on google, editor picked Mystical, Magical Maharashtra which has a 1 out of 5 star rating!

I should not be threatens with being blocked for removing incredibly bad rated Google cities such as Mystical, Magical Maharashtra THAT HAS A ONE out of 5 star rating, now please can you just take out the area with Reconstruction82.38.161.217 (talk) 06:45, 30 December 2013 (UTC)veda

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 13:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Bhuleshwar mahadev.jpg

Islamic Architecture influence claim
This is the original source for this unfound baseless claim:- http://www.indiancontents.com/2017/04/bhuleshwar-hindu-temple-with-islamic.html

In fact the whole original wikipedia article was a direct rip off from this link.

Here is a official Archaeologist's remarks on the construction of the temple:- https://punemirror.indiatimes.com/pune/civic/asi-takes-on-bhuleshwar-shrine-restoration-project/articleshow/58845776.cms

None of the Archaeologists make any reference to a Islamic architecture style. And these articles post-date this Wiki page. Concluding with these facts, it's clear with Indian journalism's poor fact-checking and referencing departments for this, it appears that the unfounded claim made in this Wiki page was the actual source taken for all the news articles making this unfounded claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.239.169.141 (talk) 12:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)