Talk:Biaxial tensile testing

--BO3064 (talk) 14:32, 18 June 2021 (UTC)The article while dealing with a niche topic adds value to wiki. It is very well written for the most part. Here are a few suggestions: 1. Ideally references are to be provided at the end of every paragraph. The superscript indicative of references needs to be before the punctuation. 2. Introduction paragraph is too small. Either expand on it or merge the purpose section with it.

Great article, well written. Maybe the "FEM analysis" section can be improved, adding images for example?. --Nicolazecca (talk) 14:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

It is well written and clear article. Just a clarification, in the first paragraph I wouldn't use the world biomaterials, it's too general and I think you're referring to a particular class of them, like biological materials. --Riccardo Munafò (talk) 14:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Observations and suggestions for improvements
The following observations and suggestions for improvements were collected, following expert review of the article within the Science, Tecnology, Society and Wikipedia course at the Politecnico di Milano, in June 2021.

-Why only characterization for uncompressible isotropic materials?

-"which can be obtained through a fewer amount of specimens with respect to uniaxial tensile tests" Experimental scatter of tensile biaxial tests is often quite high. So the number of specimens must be statistically considerable.

-"some notches with circular tips" Important to give motivation.

-"FEM analysis" Why this section if it does not deal with biaxial loading simulations?

Ettmajor (talk) 09:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)