Talk:Bible translations in Norway

Google-translated
from Norwegian Wikipedia, Evidently Google-translated but not too bad, needs fixing not Talk :( In ictu oculi (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * In my opinion, this translation needs too much work to be interesting. the "translator" has obviously no knowlegde neither to the matter, to norwegian nor to fluent english. --Orland (talk) 05:55, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Fair call. Yeah, I'm not quite sure what's going on with this. It's going to need some massive work and yes, it's easier just looking at the Norwegian than the Google-translate. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * And take a look at the first picture, where the text says "Title The magazine of Christian III's Bible". The norwegian word blad could be translated as both sheet, leaf and magazine; someone who knew what they were doing, would chose "title sheet", or even "title page" ... :-(   Bw --Orland (talk) 20:14, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Note
As noted by Orland, this article is very bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I concur. It's completely ungrammatical and unsemantical with some sentences making no sense at all. I'm not sure though, if the best solution is to copyedit it (seems impossible w/o looking at the Norwegian artice), rather than simply deleting it or stubbing it... -- Eisfbnore  &bull; talk  17:49, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Dead links
There are a lot of dead links towards the bottom and I am pretty sure most of them won't be made into pages. Another good step would be to get rid of a lot them and make it all look better. Leefkrust22 (talk) 05:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)