Talk:Bibliographic coupling

Co-citation proximity analysis does not appear to belong here as it is not a form of bibliographic coupling, nor a precursor, nor a derivative of the concept. 2003:4B:2E1D:FB57:C911:A084:B050:EAEE (talk) 15:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I think a box is missing or has been deleted? "The figure to the right illustrates the concept of bibliographic coupling. In the figure, documents A and B both cite documents C, D and E. Thus, documents A and B have a bibliographic coupling strength of 3 - the number of elements in the intersection of their two reference lists." Does anyone have a copy of this? Gallags6 (talk) 11:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)