Talk:Bibliography of the history of the Early Slavs and Rus'

Requested move 21 January 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Bibliography of the history of the Early Slavs and Rusʹ → Bibliography of the history of the Early Slavs and Rus' – Changing the prime symbol to a neutral apostrophe, per WP:TITLESPECIALCHARACTERS and WP:CONSISTENT with the main articles Rus' people, Kievan Rus', Rus' Khaganate, &c —Michael Z. 02:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support per nomination. Appears to be an uncontroversial technical request, although having consensus on the record often forestalls future argumentation. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Support for consistency. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:14, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Support, sure.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:49, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Not a substitute for specific references and sources
I sometimes see users adding a link to this page in a "Further reading" section in unsourced articles. I'd just like to note: linking to this page or Bibliography of Russian history (1223–1613) is not a substitute for specific references and sources to support specific claims in specific articles. In other words, this does not avoid the editor's WP:BURDEN. It's also not to be casually thrown around as something the reading might be interested in if they run into a random article like Yuri II of Vladimir. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 13:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)