Talk:Biblioteca Mediceo Laurenziana

I do not thik that some quotes from a website of public library belonging to a public institution regarding the access to the public library, the contents of the public library, like number of manuscrips and collections can be copyrighted. I do not think taht the plastic intervention of the author can make such informations copyrighted. Can I put the url adress of the library, or is copy protected? But if the general opinion is that this in a copyright infirgerment the so be it, I'll make a table. Considering that I don't want credit for this is not a plagiate. And considering the sand castle nature of any wikipedia article the tag is not relevant. And at least I have a little content I'm not alone: I have found another two sites with copyright violations:-)


 * Information is not copyright, though sources should be cited. Text is copyright. A good test is to cut and paste a sentence or two that you suspect are stolen, and google them. Enjoy catching the violators! It's a service to Wikipedia. Do you know how to sign your edits with four tildes? --Wetman 03:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * The copy and pasted text is only a small quote (only half of the passage used by the canadian University)

It is not ok to put? the quotes and the source?CristianChirita 07:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) "Even a brief quoted text is still marked by quotation marks," says Dr. Encyclopedia. Paraphrased text, where the idea is someone else's, gives due credit to the source of the idea. But you must know that. --Wetman 07:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) I know that and I have no objection, please validate the temp page. CristianChirita 09:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)