Talk:Bibliotheca Teubneriana

Comparable?
Isn't the Corpus Christianorum a comparable publishing venture? Adam Bishop (talk) 21:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

No, Teubner produces classical texts whereas the Corpus Christianorum is limited to Christian authors (i.e., Late Antique, non-classical authors). So the respectability may be comparable, but the purpose and scope of the collection is not. Boourns75 (talk) 15:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Non-free fair-use rationale for typographic illustration images
An editor has removed the images illustrating the series' typographic design and its history three times (isn't that a problem vis-a-vis WP:3RR? The most recent and specific edit summary cites "WP:NFCC #1,3,8." However, these are precisely the non-free content criteria that apply to the images you are insisting on removing. The images have (1) no free equivalent, (3) are minimal in number and extent, and (8) are important to readers' understanding of the topic. If there is any disagreement about the applicability of these three subjective criteria, let's discuss it here, specifically and at length, and with informed reference to the article's subject matter. I believe I'm applying these criteria in good faith and don't understand why I'm getting block threats on my user talk page. Wareh (talk) 15:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)