Talk:Bicycle Thieves

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bicycle Thieves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F19990319%2FREVIEWS08%2F903190306%2F1023
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070810033724/http://www.greencine.com/static/primers/neorealism1.jsp to http://www.greencine.com/static/primers/neorealism1.jsp
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110824233026/http://www.filmscouts.com/scripts/interview.cfm?File=2768 to http://www.filmscouts.com/scripts/interview.cfm?File=2768

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Mismatched serial number
I interpreted that scene differently. Antonio had an uncommon brand of bike and recognized the frame as his, but the Carabiniere (officer) deliberately misread the serial number, possibly paid off by the black marketers, or maybe just to avoid having to investigate it or do the paperwork. After all it's just another theft among thousands. He didn't let Antonio examine the serial number for himself, just told Antonio to trust him. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 06:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I see this was edited out of the plot summary, but I got a strong impression the officer was deliberately deceiving Antonio. I'm not saying it's a fact (it's just a movie after all) but the plot summary should allow for that interpretation. It's not as if the Italian Carabinieri at the time were squeaky clean. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 18:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Plot summary evisceration
As I said in my editsum I'm all in favour of improving plot summaries, simplifying language, removing unnecessary details etc, but not wholesale removal and replacement with a completely new summary that someone's written themselves. It's impossible for other editors to keep track of exactly what they've changed, let alone assess whether or not it's an improvement. Make any changes incremental and explain why you think they're improvements in edit summaries. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)