Talk:BigPanda

New Draft For Consideration
Hi, I am a consultant at BigPanda. I would like to share a proposed rewrite of the current article, so that independent, impartial editors have an opportunity to review the draft and provide any feedback. In comparison to the current article, I believe the draft would be a substantial improvement because:
 * It removes: The insignificant Forbes ranking/award (#36 in the ranking), lists of investors, a minor executive appointment, the word "platform," and other lists of certifications/compatibilities/partners/etc.
 * It provides a much more concise and up-to-date description of the software.

As a whole, the draft would reduce excessive detail and promotionalism. Pinging, who is the only person to have contributed on the Talk page before. StephanieMephanie1234 (talk) 22:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I looked it over and it looks good to me, so I made the edit after fixing one minor error in the infobox.
 * Your version was noticeably better. Good job.


 * As always, I stand behind any edits I make in my name, even if they were originally suggested by someone else. If anyone has a problem with the change, post a note here: I am watching this page.


 * I had to remove the unknown parameter "key people" from the infobox. To avoid this error in the future, look at the red notice at the top when you try to edit your draft. It says


 * "Warning: Page using Template:Infobox company with unknown parameter "key people" (this message is shown only in preview)."


 * Thank you for following our guidelines for COI edoiting, and feel free to ask if you have any other suggestions. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)