Talk:Big Bear

Vandalism
I tried reverted the vandalism on this article, but some of the edits do not seem to be reverting. Could someone check this out? Cyrloc 23:51, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC) Ok, its been fixed. Cyrloc 23:52, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Wasn't it the nehiyawak of the plaines? Nachomania 13:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Ooops, just remembered that Nehiyawak would mean Cree of the plains, and that vandalism that Cyrloc removed was a direct copy from a text-book. I'm not sure of the name in english, but it french, i think its L'autonomisation, le pouvoir, or something like that. Nachomania 20:41, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Sources needed
Template messages/Sources of articlesSriMesh | talk  01:08, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

what about Louis Riel?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.38.15.162 (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Name
Is there a source that proves that Big Bear's name in Cree was mistahi-maskwa? This form appears ungrammatical. A direct translation of Big Bear into Cree is Mista-Maskwa, not Mistahi-Maskwa. Can someone verify this? Mikisiw (talk) 18:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Peer Review and Potential Edits for the Article
Content wise, this article can become- and is in the process of becoming a very informative if there is an elaboration on the events regarding his involvement in the North West rebellion. It says in the beginning that he was notable for his involvement in the rebellion, but under the "Conflicts with the Canadian Government", he played a "minimal role in the the overall uprising, but warriors from among Big Bear's people under the command of Wandering Spirit killed nine white men at Frog Lake in an incident that became known as the Frog Lake Massacre. Although Big Bear himself personally attempted to prevent the killings and subsequently expressed regret for the actions of the younger Cree warriors, the events at Frog Lake alarmed the Dominion Government." The article would benefit if there was more emphasis on the aftermath of this massacre. Another example would be providing some insight on the rhetoric Big Bear proposed to other Native bands that highlighted the unfairness of the Canadian government. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miguelmabilangan (talk • contribs) 17:06, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Peer Review and Suggestions for Imporvement
Overall, information written about Big Bear discussed is great. However, some suggestions in editing this article is to have a better introduction of the article. A good Wikipedia article has a strong introduction that lays out how the article will provide information to the readers. With having a strong introduction of Big Bear, the readers will be more interested in learning about who Big Bear was and what he contributed to society. Having a brief sentence does summarize the main points about Big Bear but it could use additional information. Another suggestion for improving the article is to have more information about Big Bear's earlier life. The terminology (Canada Government, Canadian Settlers, etc) used in the article does not relate to Big Bear and this era because after Confederation, British North America became the Dominion Government. Another section that could use additional information is expanding upon why Big Bear refused to sign Treaty 6. Keep up the good work hope my suggestions help! StanLeehen (talk 20:10, 23 March 2015

Peer Review for Big Bear
Overall, the information presented in this article is good. However, the major suggestion I would have in editing this article is a better introduction. You mention that he was Cree leader who played a critical role in the Numbered Treaties. First off, what is the Numbered Treaties? Why was he involved? How and why was he involved in the Red River Rebellion? These are just a few of many questions that come to mind. As Stan mentioned, a good Wikipedia article has to have a strong introduction which lays out the information for the readers. In this regard, the article does not have a strong introduction and it would be nice if it was revised. This occurs through out the entire article. One suggestion to improve would be to read out loud and see if the sentence makes sense to you. Another suggestion would be to have one of your friends read the article and see if what your saying makes sense. In other words, you should use the KISS method (ie. Keep It Simple Stupid). Obviously, this article is to the point, however, some basic revision and elaborating on why Big Bear's role in treaties and conflicts is significant to Canadian history would greatly help. Also, make sure that you include more sources (there are 4 citations from the same book). tasobouzinelos (talk 10:05, 24 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.54.146.232 (talk)

Editing Suggestions
Overall, I think this is a really good article. I like the images that you have included, as it offers a nice visual element to the written work, and I think the subheadings are well organized. To make some minor suggestions, I would recommend that you move the Treaty 6 section to be above the section about Big Bear's trial, to keep the work chronological. I would also separate the information of his death from the section on his Trial, just to keep it concise. Finally, I would rename the "Literature" section to "Further Reading" as it becomes clear you are suggesting the list are sources which can be looked at for further information. I'm looking forward to seeing how the final article turns out! :) --Erikaleu (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Suggestions
Here are a couple ideas i have about your article. Like perviously mentioned i would expand the beginning segment to include more general information. Additionally, in the section lab led conflicts with canada you mention briefly that he had a conflict with crow, it would be interesting if you could expand on their relationship. I found that the small par t where you mentioned him left me wanting to know more! Having said this, overall looking great so far!! HillaryViolet (talk) 14:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Peer Review
Overall the article looks good. Each section is filled out well, and you thoroughly explained the details you've posted in the introduction of the article. I had the suggestions that "Landscape" in "Historical Landscape" be decapitalized, as per Wikipedia heading standards, as well as adding circa 1825 to his birth under "Early life and leadership. I went ahead and actually made the edits... Sorry I wasn't clear on the requirements of this assignment. There are some other minor details that still need to be revised though. Under "Treaty 6", in the second last sentence beginning, "Big Bear strongly...", "believe' is spelled incorrectly. Then, in the first sentence of the next paragraph, there needs to be a space between the comma and "at one point". Besides these minor edits, Your article looks great though, good job! Justo Mendoza (talk) 15:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

this parliament — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.160.26.145 (talk) 01:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)