Talk:Big Ears

Title reverted
I reverted the undiscussed controversial move of this article from Big Ears to Big Ears (film) so it's back at the original title, Big Ears. NOTE: any move from an base name unblemished by disambiguation to a disambiguated name when the base name remains a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to the article, because there is no justification to have the base anme redirect elsewhere nor to have a dab page, is inherently controversial as unnecessary disambiguation. --В²C ☎ 00:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well that's disruptive. You've moved an article getting |Big_Ears|Big_Ears_Festival 11 out of 67 daily views to default baseline position for what? Evidently either a dab is needed or Big Ears from Noddy would be on the baseline. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I was just reverting per BRD an undiscussed move that was obviously controversial. If the character rather than the film is the primary topic then the titles should be adjusted accordingly... after an RM discussion. But since this is a two dabs situation I'm good with either being at the basename as  being no worse for users than a dab page being at the base name, and often better.  --В²C ☎ 20:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * A film getting 11 out of 67 daily views having (film) after it is not "obviously controversial", neither is it "a two dabs situation", see Big ears. I suggest that you please restore (film) to the title. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:02, 18 March 2017 (UTC)