Talk:Big Hole River

Extinction is the wrong term and reflects a biased POV
The Arctic Grayling, fluvial or otherwise, is nowhere close to extinction. Very robust and stable populations exist in Montana, Canada and Alaska. The fact that the Big Hole population is in dire straights is a sad state of affairs, but to use the term Extinct is simply incorrect. The proper term is Extirpate, sometimes known as local extinction. Using extinct instead of extirpate demonstrates a bit of bias, since most people know what extinction is and would be alarmed about it. However, the term extirpated is not a big vocabulary term for the public. Lets keep this an NPOV article. --Mike Cline 22:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Big Hole Watershed Committee
Is this a personal POV. Where's the source? Please provide.

The Watershed Committee has reached out to local and selected interested entities and developed a community-based consensus group with a narrow constituency. Sadly, the committee has precluded activist voices such as the Center for Biological Diversity and the Montana Wildlife Federation. Critical voices are not welcome. The Watershed Committee's primary source of funding has been from "earmarks" by former U.S. Senator Conrad Burns.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Hole River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090310102406/http://fwp.mt.gov/content/getItem.aspx?id=24929 to http://fwp.mt.gov/content/getItem.aspx?id=24929

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)