Talk:Big Painting No. 6/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Lead is a bit short. Surely it can be expanded on further?
 * Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It once set a record auction price for a painting by a living American artist. --> For how much?
 * fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Big Painting No. 6 is in the Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen collection in Düsseldorf. --> Unsourced
 * ref added.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure if details is the best title for the heading. Description, maybe?
 * Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Critical commentary --> Reception
 * Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I see no other issues with the article. It is well referenced and written.


 * All issues addressed. Passing the article! Statυs  (talk) 16:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Way too much copyrighted material in the footnotes. No excuse for this. Editor should have used his own words. MathewTownsend (talk) 23:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)