Talk:Big Thunder Ski Jumping Center/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 08:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "Funding was then cut and he venue" - the
 * Fixed. Arsenikk (talk)  20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Is Thor Hansen his brother?
 * Source doesn't say, although it would seem natural. Arsenikk (talk)  20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * "Lille Norway Ski Area. I" - do you know why it was named so?
 * Source doesn't say. My guess is that the Hansens were Norwegian. Arsenikk (talk)  20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * meters have to be converted with convert
 * Done. Arsenikk (talk)  20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * what are "in-runs"?
 * I've link to the appropriate article which explains what it is. Any follower of ski jumping should know what it is so it would be unnatural to explain it inline, but I agree that a link should be in place. Arsenikk (talk)  20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: A few small fixes are needed
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Hope you enjoyed this oddity of Canadian history. Arsenikk (talk)  20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: A few small fixes are needed
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Hope you enjoyed this oddity of Canadian history. Arsenikk (talk)  20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Hope you enjoyed this oddity of Canadian history. Arsenikk (talk)  20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Hope you enjoyed this oddity of Canadian history. <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  20:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)