Talk:Big lie

About China's "committing human rights abuses against Uyghurs in Xinjiang"
this accusation currently has no conclusion, so it's inappropriate to label this thing as "big lie". Coddlebean (talk) 06:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I tried adding "pov section", but it got reverted Coddlebean (talk) 06:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Ask yourself one question: "Is that content backed by a RS?" Whether there is "no conclusion" is rather irrelevant. Accusations, in this case a false one by CCP, are common, and they are misusing the term "big lie" in their defense. If there's a better way to frame and word the content, feel free to improve it. -- Valjean (talk) ( PING me ) 17:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Sources will do what they do, we just follow the sources. What would be innaproriate would be trying to overrule the sources with a personal POV, I hope thats not what you're attempting. Horse Eye&#39;s Back (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Lack of Objectivity
If you want to viewed as a credible source for information and to continue to receive donations from readers such as myself, it is important to me that you maintain a broad, fair and objective presentation of the facts. I do not believe this is happening. Biased reporting about the “Big Lie”, steal your credibility and promotes a lack of interest in what is on your site - because it is not credible. I want both sides of the truth. 2600:1700:4E1:8380:CFB:74FA:9759:5F64 (talk) 17:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Then tell us what you think isn't objective, using reliable sources to support your assertions.  Acroterion   (talk)   18:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)