Talk:Bigeye thresher/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It is a wonderful article. I have only a few comments. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 17:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Does the female have two uteruses?
 * Yes, all live-bearing sharks have two - rearranged the sentence to make this clearer


 * "It is also significant to Taiwanese fisheries, which land about 220 t annually." - what does the "t" stand for?
 * "metric tons" - spelling it out

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 17:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments addressed. Thanks. -- Yzx (talk) 18:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

Contratulations! An excellent article.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Consistent with MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced  b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Yes  b (focused): Remains focused on topic
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 21:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)