Talk:Biker Boyz

The previous synopsis was wrong, and badly written. I still have to fix some of the links and grammar left by the previous editor, though. -MJPerry

No stub?
All I have to say about it now. I fixed the awful synopsis, added a cast and some trivia. Should it still be a stub?

apologies
sorry, i thought the synopsis was fine; could you tell me where i went wrong? Once again apologies

Jacky Boy

Erm, I can't remember specifically. You said Kid beat Dog, which is wrong. There was some other stuff too.

Kid and Smoke were side by side when Smoke eased off the throttle, or was just slightly ahead. Either way, this should not be listed as Smoke decidedly being in the lead- there was a lot of lead-trading in the race. Smoke decided to give Kid his wish, to beat Smoke, as everything up to this point was Kid's defiance of Smoke and his ways.

Duskshade —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.179.189.165 (talk) 02:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Citing the sources
The three sources that need cititation can all be confirmed by watching the Biker Boyz DVD bonus features.

Realism vs. Action vs. Storyline vs. Acting vs. Rating vs. Entertainment
Which movie is better in all aspects? This or Torque? According to IMDB Biker Boyz has a rating of 4.1/10 and Torque has a rating of 3.4/10. So based on rating this movie looks the winner, but is it? Cazique (talk) 14:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

If only.....
All through the movie, it would have been nice to see Slick Will race just once, since at his funeral he was treated with the highest respects of the Black Knights. Just one race would have been cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.162.128.54 (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Citation on Controversial Comments?
Under Reception and Cult Status (cult status? Really?) it says that the opening tracking shot is "considered one of the best". That's a big statement, particularly regarding a film that's been pretty resoundingly slammed by critics. Is there a source for that quote? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miracle Five (talk • contribs) 02:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Development
Maybe it's me, but much of the "Development" section reads like nothing more than trivia. I certainly don't see anyhing regarding the development of the film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.183.228.143 (talk) 23:14, 24 July 2011 (UTC)