Talk:Bikram Choudhury/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Analog Horror (talk · contribs) 05:11, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

There is one problem with the article: Most of the references are about his rape cases and not about his actual career.

I am going to deny this for good article. If you can find references about his actual career, I will accept it.

Analog Horror, ( Speak ) 05:11, 8 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Well, thank you for looking in. Obviously I don't agree with your judgement, nor as it happens with its manner: I have given the article extensive attention and have ensured both that it covers the topic and that it is fully and reliably cited, so I would ask any future reviewer to do me the honour of reviewing it in rather more detail and waiting to discuss each point made before deciding on an outcome. As to the "references about his actual career, there are actually many in the article already; even if a source has a title concerning the latest twist in a legal battle, it often, indeed usually, also covers details of his earlier life; and I would not accept any numerical argument anyway, as commentators naturally focus on battles rather than quiet normal life, and Wikipedia article editors can only use what is available. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:16, 8 March 2020 (UTC)