Talk:Bill Gatton Student Center

Peer Review
I think that your page is off to a great start! I love the idea of doing a page UK related. I would be sure to go back to the "Naming" heading and see the formatting error. I would also be sure to add more to your resources page and maybe add about the Stuckert Career Center that is on campus. I think you did a great job with the non bias language, but sure to go through and check for any grammar issues. Also, try to have even information for each heading if possible. Also, your sources seem pretty good; very reliable!

The information is solid with references to where you found the information. I can see that there are still a few subheadings that are yet to be finished. Also, the page could use an info box that gives a brief description of the Gatton Student Center. Also, the references seemed to not carry over its format so that is something to look into. There are links to other articles and the content is easy access. Besides a few little touches here and there, (and also finishing the page) there isn’t much that I would add to the article. --Bubblespop9755 (talk) 14:11, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
Good start to your article. Summary in the beginning is well put together and has good information. The subsections that you have does a good job describing your topic, and they have good in-depth information. Make sure to fix up your info-box and continue to fill out the subsections. Its good that you have your references section and external links section put together already. You also did a good job not putting opinions in your article and keeping bias out of it. Tkl15 (talk) 03:41, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
The lead of your article is strong, but does present some minimal bias in word choice. The importance of the article is established well! In the first section of the article, the word "services" is spelled in correctly. Also, "fast" does not need to be capitalized. Be sure to check for spelling and grammar errors! Are there any other headings that could be added to your article? The three headings that already exist in your article are in a sensible order, good work! The subheadings are effective in terms of additional information on your topic, but more detail could create a stronger page as a whole. Specifically, the subheadings under "resources" could benefit from more detail. The "student activities board" and "visitor center" is incomplete, so do not forget to add to this. Also, the page needs a brief, complete info box. The references and external links are added, so good job with that! Make sure that the references are formatted properly. Your information seems appropriate and reliable. You did an awesome job with creating links to other pages, however, some of the links are insignificant. Overall, this article is well-written. The topic has a purpose and benefits Wikipedia (and UK, of course)! Akm138 (talk) 04:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)