Talk:Bill Ponsford/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

OK...(rolls up sleeves) let's see what we have here....Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * A heavy set man, - gah! I never remember and my connection is insanely slow today - does this need a hyphen betwixt the two words?
 * No hyphen or space, see Mattinbgn\talk 03:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Critics questioned his ability against fast bowling however and the hostile short-pitched English bowling in the bodyline series of 1932–33 was a contributing factor in his premature retirement from cricket the following year. - I think I'd place the "However" at the beginning. Also, is there any extra meaning with the "premature" over the plainer "early" - I am open-minded.
 * Changed both, why use a long word when a short word will do. -- Mattinbgn\talk 03:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Ponsford would go to some lengths to avoid interaction with the public - "went" (no need for future perfect (?) tense
 * Agreed. I am not sure what the name of the tense is either. It is a bad habit of mine to change tenses in an article. -- Mattinbgn\talk 03:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

I think the above issues are trivial enough to not be deal-breakres. I copyedited for flow but overall the article clearly passes GA for referencing, comprehensiveness and layout.

As far as going onto FAC, there is a little reduplication of material but I can't see a way of avoiding that. Could massage the prose a bit more too I guess. Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for the review and the copyediting. FAC is the eventual goal but some work on the prose will be required. -- Mattinbgn\talk 03:54, 23 April 2009 (UTC)