Talk:Biological pacemaker

Needs a better lead?
The lead currently appears to describe the natural workings of the heart. The article itself appears to be about using biological materials to act as an artificial pacemaker for the heart.

Could someone please verify or refute this assertion -- and either way, could someone make a more appropriate lead? Thanks, NapoliRoma (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * This was fixed a while back -- thanks, LostRaven! NapoliRoma (talk) 22:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)