Talk:Bionic (Christina Aguilera album)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: CallMe Nathan   &bull;  Talk2Me   05:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Right now, this article stands at a strong B. There are a few strong issues that lead me to fail this article. First and foremost, the second paragraph of the lead is in shambles and needs work. It only focuses in the UK, where there is still wierd wording (mixed reception? I call it weak sales). There is no focus on any other major music markets. Aside from that, my main issue are the references, which each one has an issue. Some are not reliable and almost every single one is poirly formatted. If you need help or have questions, I will be happy to outline their sepcifics and help you out. Good luck!-- CallMe Nathan  &bull;  Talk2Me   17:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)