Talk:Biopace

As it stands, this page is an inferior plagarism of Sheldon Brown's Biopace page, which features more and better information. If in fact that's the only major reference to this topic on the web, perhaps this page is purposeless except to link to Sheldon Brown (whose site is itself a bit of a bicycle encyclopedia). --NickGlasowiski 21:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. This article as it stands serves more as an uncertified urban legend. --abach 19:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I would say we should contact Sheldon Brown and ask him for permission to use his text for the wiki article. The wiki article, as it is, only serves to confuse the reader, whereas Brown's text explains the technology in a way that everyone can understand. -- Alexey Topol (talk) 23:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sadly, Sheldon Brown passed away in 2008. -AndrewDressel (talk) 05:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

It should also be noted that within the bicycle industry the term "biopace" has come to represent any new product introduced claiming to revolutionize a certain aspect of cycling, yet on closer inspection is poorly made and doesn't perform as advertised.
 * Only that Biopace was well-made and only got a bad reputation cause people confused it with elliptical chainwheels. -- Alexey Topol (talk) 23:23, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Whoever keeps reverting the article to talk about "increased mechanical complexity" doesn't know anything about Biopace. They're chainrings. They don't need any more parts than regular chainrings. You just adjust the front derailleur a little higher to clear the major diameter. There's no additional equipment necessary, and the components such as front derailleur, crankset, bottom bracket and chain remain identical. If you can't come up with specific examples of increased complexity, stop trying to weasel in misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.44.219.201 (talk) 20:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)