Talk:Bipartisan Cafe/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Voorts (talk · contribs) 22:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Review to come.

Excellent work. Just a few comments:

Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 23:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Refs 55 looks like it's for the wrong restaurant.
 * Fixed. Good catch! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The history section should be reorganized chronologically and the subsections removed.
 * I've tried to address your concern. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I think the section on Emerson's views should be removed and relevant in-scope information about how his views interact with the running of the restaurant should be folded into the history section. As written, the section is undue (15% of the article text per WP:PROSESIZE). If Emerson himself is notable, he should get his own article where his views can be described.
 * I've tried to address your concern. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I also don't think there's a great reason to separate out newspapers from other RSes that have reviewed the restaurant in the reception section. Although not necessary for GA, I think that section can also be reorganized a bit (perhaps thematically), and some of the block quotes can be paraphrased down.
 * I've tried to address your concern. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Not necessary for GA, but I fixed a bunch of refs during my edit. Make sure you're including author names and following MOS:CONFORMTITLE.
 * Thank you very much! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)