Talk:Bird (mathematical artwork)

Should we keep this as an article?
I created this page because I see a lot of reliable sources including CNN, The New York Times, Science Friday, Scientific American, American Mathematical Society, Plus Magazine, IMKT, etc talking about it. Some of them use it as the main subject and some of them use it as an example. I strongly believe that we should keep it since otherwise many articles about other artists' works should be deleted as well.Wasraw (talk) 21:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

@Ionia15 @Chiswick Chap @Pointly @Coldcreation @Math CRXVC Could you please express your opinion about this discussion? Wasraw (talk) 22:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

@Funandtrvl @Reify-tech Could you please express your opinion about this discussion? Wasraw (talk) 22:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with keeping it but perhaps we should also remove similar content from the artist's article. I see some sources on the web that investigate the artwork in a mathematical way. I think it would be better to include them in the article. Pointly (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep It is a very nice article, and very well-referenced. I agree that duplicate coverage in the artist's article should be consolidated here. Reify-tech (talk) 05:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, good article, interesting STEM subject. --Funandtrvl (talk) 19:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: nice work.

North8000 (talk) 02:45, 28 May 2022 (UTC)