Talk:Birmingham–Peterborough line

Untitled
According to this a new station 'Coleshill Parksway' is to open on the line later this year. Worth mentioning somewhere. G-Man * 22:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Line diagram
Can anyone explain why the line elements do not join up as they do at nl:Wikipedia:Spoorlijnsjablonen – and can this be fixed? -- Picapica 13:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I believe they do join up for most users, it depends on your browser settings. Try altering your default text size and see if that makes any difference. The best place to ask is WP:RDT – Tivedshambo (talk) 17:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

So they do, I now see (on my home computer – earlier I was looking at the page at work). Strange, though, about the difference in the display between en: and nl: when using the same browser with the same settings. Thanks for your answer, anyway. -- Picapica 18:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Redundancy?
Is the comprehensive list of stations served (complete with OS grid references) necessary in the body of the text, given that it duplicates almost entirely the information already available in the line diagram infobox at top right? -- Picapica 16:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

EricITOworld (talk) 11:57, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I have removed the redundant information, stations served as well as former stations are all in the line diagram.

Line diagram again
Since the line diagram has been nested in the infobox it breaks the line diagram by introducing spaces into the line. We either need to fix this or not to nest the line diagrams in the infobox. Probably a general problem rather than specifically related to this article. Any thoughts. Keith D (talk) 22:15, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I have moved the line diagram out of the info box for the time being. Happy for someone to integrate it who can make it work.PeterEastern (talk) 12:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

rolling stock
the only stock that regually uses the whole line is class 170s all the others listed justy use the line between wigston north junction and syston. Should they be moved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.77.135 (talk) 18:02, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Birmingham to Peterborough Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100725012028/http://www.hinckley.netfirms.com:80/Hinckley%20-%20R.htm to http://www.hinckley.netfirms.com/Hinckley%20-%20R.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Birmingham to Peterborough Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005171947/http://www.logisticsmanager.com/Articles/7891/132m+boost+for+rail+freight+.html to http://www.logisticsmanager.com/Articles/7891/132m+boost+for+rail+freight+.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606051050/http://www.eera.gov.uk/GetAsset.aspx?id=fAAyADUANAAxAHwAfABGAGEAbABzAGUAfAB8ADAAfAA1 to http://www.eera.gov.uk/GetAsset.aspx?id=fAAyADUANAAxAHwAfABGAGEAbABzAGUAfAB8ADAAfAA1
 * Added tag to http://www.eadt.co.uk/content/eadt/news/story.aspx?brand=EADOnline&category=News&tBrand=EADOnline&tCategory=xDefault&itemid=IPED05%20Feb%202010%2009%3A56%3A31%3A940

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Update and clarification needed
This from the article needs an update: "The work, detailed in the Network Rail Freight Route Utilisation Strategy, should be completed by 2014." And this needs clarification: "In February 2010 Network Rail confirmed that it would ... perform work to increase capacity between Ely–Peterborough line..." Is it 'to increase capacity between here and the Ely–Peterborough line' or 'to increase capacity on the Ely–Peterborough line'? -Lopifalko (talk) 07:18, 8 February 2022 (UTC)